Chapter 7:  The Personalities of the Predecessors to Bani Umayyah

 

"Verily in the Prophet of Allah is the best example."  -- Holy Qur'an (33:21)

 

One of the primary sources of Islamic legislation is the testimony of the Companions of the Prophet (the sahabah).  Even in this day and age, just saying that a particular companion said something is enough to engender complete respect of that companion and his words and unquestioning compliance with what he or she said.  For that reason, it is extremely important to investigate what exactly makes a person a sahabah.  After all, thousands of people, if not more, were in the presence of the Holy Prophet (s), and yet many of them were enemies of the Prophet (s) and therefore could not be relied upon.  What makes an onlooker a sahabah?

 

Al-Qaamus al-Muhit defines suhbah (companionship) as "al-mu'aasharah al-mulaazimah" which means living together or associating together inseparably.  Raaghib al-Isfahahaani[1] says:  "This term applies only to the one who is constantly and continuously in companionship."  Therefore, according to these definitions, a companion of the Prophet (s) would be someone who associated very closely to the Prophet (s) regardless of whether he was a Muslim or a non-Muslim, righteous or unrighteous, or whether he believed in him or disbelieved in him.

 

Islamic jurists agree unanimously that for someone bear the title of "companion", he or she must have been Muslim and must have sat with the Prophet (s) for a long time (tallat mujaalasatuhu) while listening attentively to him and learning from him, not just visiting him and leaving without seeking knowledge.[2]

 

The narrators (muhaddithun) knew the companion to be "every Muslim who saw the Prophet (s)".[3]  Others defined "companion" as "any Muslim who lived during the time of the Prophethood even if he did not see the Prophet (s)".[4]  Still other narrators (muhaddithun) further expanded the definition of "companion" to encompass every Muslim who met the Prophet (s) and believed in him and then apostatized and then came back to Islam again.[5]

 

The Muslim ummah itself was divided into three categories in how they viewed the sahabah:

 

(1)  A minority sect of Muslims (al-firqa al-kaamiliyah[6] and the ghulaat[7]) attributed kufr (apostasy) to all the companions.  This view is of course completely rejected by all the scholars of Islam in the Sunni and Shi'i traditions.

 

(2)  'Adaalat al-Sahabah.  This group attributed absolute 'adaalah (honesty and sincerity) to all the companions; this view is commonly held within the Sunni tradition.  For example, al-Khatib al-Baghdad says:  "The justness of the sahabah is proven and firmly established (thaabitatun ma'lumah)."[8]  Ibn Hazm says:  "Undoubtedly, all the Companions are of the people of Paradise."[9]

 

Nevertheless, many prominent jurists and scholars in the Sunni tradition rejected the idea of the absolute righteousness of all of the companions.  They included al-Sa'd al-Tafatahzaani, al-Maarizi, and al-Shawqaani[10] as well as scholars from a later generation such as Shaikh Muhammad 'Abduh, Shaikh Mahmud Abu Riyah, and others.[11]  They argued that the companions were not infallible and so among them were the righteous and the unrighteous.

 

(3)  The Qur'an, the Prophet (s), and Ahl al-Bayt(as).  According to the Qur'an, the group of companions was composed of the righteous and the unrighteous, the believers and the hypocrites, and while companionship was a great honor, it did not assure infallibility; this view has been adopted by the Shi'a scholars.  The Qur'an does not guarantee automatic righteousness to all of the companions of the Prophet (s), nor does it grant all of them entrance into Paradise.  Many of the righteous companions are praised and honored in the Qur'an, while others have been criticized and cursed.  The Qur'an says:  "And of those who are around you of the (rustic) Arabs (of the desert) there are hypocrites; and from the inhabitants of Madinah (also); Stubborn are they in hypocrisy; Thou knowest them not, We know them; twice will We chastise them, then shall they be turned unto a grievous chastisement."  (9:101)  It also says:  "And Muhammad is not but an Apostle, (Other) apostles have already passed away prior to him; Therefore if he dieth or be slain, will ye turn upon your heels?  And he who turneth upon his heels will by no means do harm to God in the least, and shortly will God reward the grateful ones."  (3:144)  These verses and others, such as those in Surah al-Tawbah (Repentance) and Surah al-Munafiqun (The Hypocrites),[12] indicate that a group of hypocrites existed among the Companions of the Prophet (s).

 

In many of the hadith, the companions themselves rejected each other or refuted what other companions were saying.  As for the leaders of the Islamic schools of thought, Abu Hanifah has been said to have said that all the companions are pure except a few, and he mentioned some names.[13]  Malik ibn Anas was asked what to do when two narrators narrated contradictory hadith from the Prophet (s) and whether both should be accepted.  He replied that, no, the truth is only one, and when he was asked about ikhtilaaf al-sahabah, or the disagreement of the companions, he said that one side should be right and the other wrong, and the matter had to be investigated.[14]  And Shafi'i states that he does not accept the testimony of four of the companions:  Mu'aawiyah, Amr ibn al-'Aas, al-Mugheerah, and Ziyaad.[15]

 

 

The "Hadith of the Stars"

 

A famous hadith called the "hadith of the stars" states:  "My companions are like stars:  whichever you follow, you will be guided."[16]  Although this hadith is pivotal to the Sunni stance, Ahmad ibn Hanbal states that this hadith is unauthentic.[17]  Abu Ibrahim al-Muzni, a student of al-Shafi'i, and his companions also doubted the authenticity of this hadith.[18]  Abu Bakr al-Bazzaz attacked this hadith and expounded upon its flaws.[19]  Other narrators (huffaz) also mention its weakness and the unreliability of its chain of narrators.  They include:  Abul Hasan al-Darqutni, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Hazm, Ibn 'Abd al-Birr, Ibn Asaakir, Ibn al-Jawzi, Ibn Daahiyah, Abu Hayaan al-Andalusi, Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi, and, surprisingly, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah.[20]  Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani too stated that, although famous, this hadith had an unreliable and weak chain of narrators (isnaad).

 

Given these doubts, this hadith -- one of the most important pillars of the concept of the absolute righteousness of the companions -- falls apart and is shown to be nothing other than fabrication.

 

 

The Flawlessness of the Companions in Established Hadith

 

The Prophet (saawaws) has been established to have said:  "I am the first who will reach the Fount (hawdh al-kawthar).  Some people will try to reach me, but they will not be able to.  I will say:  'O my Lord, they are my companions.'  Allah will answer:  'You do not know what they have invented after you.'"[21]  By this hadith alone, some of the Companions are shown to have erred.  Anyone who considers them all to be just will be violating this hadith.  Anyone who considers them all to be just will also have to answer why some of the Companions who killed 'Uthmaan ibn 'Affaan will also go to heaven simply because they were companions.  And anyone who considers them all to be just will have to considered why the outlaws who revolted against Imam 'Ali and began civil war in the battles of Jamal, Siffin, and Nahrawan will also go to Paradise.

 

The Participation of the Companions in the Battles of Islam

 

Despite popular misconception, neither Abu Bakr nor 'Umar nor 'Uthmaan participated actively in the main battles of Islam.  Not until the time of Mu'awiyah did fabrications about their roles in these battles begin to surface in the effort of Bani Umayyah to attribute the virtues of ahl al-bayt (as) to others.  According to Ibn 'Arafah:  "Most of the hadith which have been fabricated and developed in favor of the sahaabah and their virtues and their bravery and heroism were fabricated during the time of Bani Umayyah to seek nearness to them and to defy and humiliate Bani Haashim."[22]

 

 

Uhud

 

On the day of Uhud, the Holy Prophet (saawaws) raised his sword and called:  "Who can give this sword its right?"  'Umar said:  "I can," but the Prophet (saawaws) turned away from him, for he knew that 'Umar would not do that.  Zubayr said:  "I can," but the Prophet (saawaws) refused him as well.  Then Abu Dujaanah stood and asked:  "What is the right of that sword?"  The Prophet (saawaws) replied:  "You fight with it until it breaks."  Abu Dujaanah swore:  "I am the one who will give it its right," so the Prophet (saawaws) gave his sword to Abu Dujaanah.[23]

 

The battle commenced.  Tabari says:[24]

 

'Ali ibn Abi Taalib began slaying the leaders of the battalions of the mushrikeen in Uhud who were carrying the banners.  Whenever a leader of another battalion would approach the Prophet (s), the Prophet (s) would look at him and say:  "Start your strike on him," so he would strike them and disperse them.  Group after group came, and 'Ali ibn Abi Taalib did the same until Jibra'il came to the Prophet and said:  "O Messenger of Allah, this is real solidarity."  The Prophet (s) said:  "Yes, because he is part of me, and I am part of you."  Jibra'il replied:  "And I am from you both, O Messenger of Allah."

 

What happened next is recorded forever in the Holy Qur'an.  Allah (swt) says:  "Behold, you were climbing up the high ground, without even casting a side glance at anyone, and the Messenger in your rear was calling you back."  (3:153)  This verse clearly indicates the opposition the Holy Prophet (saawaws) faced in controlling his forces.  Examining it deeper, its tafsir explicitly refers to Abu Bakr, 'Umar, and the other companions -- all of whom fled the scene except for ten who stood with the Holy Prophet (saawaws).  Seven of those ten -- including one woman named Naseebah Umm Amaarah Bint Ka'b who fought until she was wounded on her shoulder -- were from the Ansaar, and two -- 'Ali ibn Abi Taalib (as) and Abu Dujaaan -- were from the Quraysh.[25]  As Muhammad Hasanain Hayqil says:  "The main concern of every Muslim on that day was to rescue himself and salvage himself -- except for those who had been protected and blessed by Allah, such as 'Ali ibn Abi Taalib."[26] 

 

The Qur'an continues:  "It was Shaytan who caused them to fail because of some evil they had done."  (3:153)  Most likely, the evil here was disobedience to the Holy Prophet (saawaws).  For although the Holy Prophet (saawaws) ordered them to remain in their positions, they ran after the war booty, and therefore the mushrikeen defeated them.

 

During his caliphate, 'Umar recalled that incident when a lady came with 'Umar's daughter asking for clothing.  'Umar gave clothing to the lady but not to his daughter.  When asked why he did what he did, he replied:  "The father of that lady stood on the day of Uhud and did not run away, but the father of this one" -- he pointed to his daughter -- "ran away on the day of Uhud, and he did not stand firm.[27]  Abu Bakr too later referred to his flight on that day.[28]

 

Although most of the companions returned a few hours after the battle, 'Uthmaan disappeared for three days.[29]  When he returned, the Holy Prophet (saawaws) admonished him:  "It took you so long to return, why three days?"[30]

 

 

Badr

 

A similar situation arose during the Battle of Badr.  On the eve of the battle, Abu Bakr and 'Umar staunchly refused to fight.  They told the Holy Prophet (saawaws):  "This is Quraysh; the Quraysh are so powerful; the Quraysh never believed when they believed; the Quraysh were never defeated because they are so powerful.  So do not fight them."  Displeased, the Prophet (saawaws) turned away from them, until Sa'd ibn Ma'aadh promised the Prophet (saawaws):  "Go, and we will fight with you to the last breath."  At that, the Prophet (saawaws) became pleased again, and on the morning of the 17th of Ramadhaan, the Muslims engaged the mushrikeen in the Battle of Badr.[31]  Seventy mushrikeen met their end in the Battle of Badr, half by the sword of Imam 'Ali, and the other half with the help of the sword of Imam 'Ali (as).[32]

 

Conversely, 'Uthmaan was not even present during the Battle of Badr, just as he was absent from Bay'at al-Ridhwaan and fled Uhud and Hunayn.  During the battle of Khandaq, he refused to fight Amr ibn al-Widd al-Aamir.  Even after the death of the Prophet (saawaws), he declined to participate in the wars against those who rejected the caliphate of Abu Bakr.  During the time of 'Umar, too, he refused military service.  He was known for avoiding war; a former ally of his, 'Abd al-Rahmaan ibn 'Auf, said:  "This is a testimony of one of 'Uthmaan's friends:  I was not the one who was absent from Badr, and I was not the one who ran away on the day of Uhud" -- meaning of course that 'Uthmaan was the one who did.[33]

 

 

Khaybar

 

Khaybar took place during the seventh year of the Hijrah about 160 km north of Madinah.  Due to the terrain and the fortress that the Jews barricaded themselves in, the first attempt to break through, led by Abu Bakr, returned defeated.  The second day, 'Umar led the Muslim army, but he too returned unsuccessful.  As the historians say:  "They returned not only defeated but exchanging blames of cowardice on each other."[34]  After the first two attempts failed, the Holy Prophet (saawaws) declared:  "Tomorrow, I will give this banner, the leadership of this battle, to a man who is loved by Allah and His Apostle, and he himself loves Allah and His Apostle.  Allah will open the way at his hands.  He will go forward and not be defeated or retreat."  At the time, Imam 'Ali (as) was ill.  Some of the companions brought him to the Prophet (saawaws) as he leaned on them.  The Holy Prophet (saawaws) prayed for him, put the banner in his hands, and said:  "O Allah, may the heat and the cold not affect him anymore."  Imam 'Ali (as) later said:  "After the prayer of the Prophet (saawaws), I did not feel any heat or cold."[35]  From there, Imam 'Ali (as) went and defeated Marhab, the leader of the enemies in the castle, and Marhab's two brothers, Haarith and Yassir. [36]

 

 

Hunayn

 

The Battle of Hunayn broke out only a few days after the conquest of Makkah in the eighth year of the Hijrah.  The Prophet (saawaws) had brought 10,000 soldiers with him to recapture Makkah, and, after their success, 2,000 more people in Makkah accepted Islam and joined him.  So the army of 12,000 met their enemy in the valley of Hunayn between Makkah and the city of Taa'if. 

 

Like the Battle of Uhud, the Battle of Hunayn is mentioned in the Holy Qur'an:  "Assuredly, Allah did help you in many battlefields, and on the day of Hunayn; behold, your great numbers elated you, but they availed you nothing; the land did constrain you, and you turned back fleeing." (9:25-26)  According to the tafsir, Abu Bakr, seeing their numbers, had said:  "No one will defeat us while we have such a large number."[37]  However, their numbers were meaningless:  faith, bravery, sincerity, and willingness were what were important, and those qualities were lacking.  Although many companions pledged that they would not flee,[38] they did, including Abu Bakr, 'Umar, 'Uthmaan, Ibn al-Jarrah, al-Mugheerah ibn Shu'bah, Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, Ma'aadh ibn Jabal, 'Usayd ibn Hubayr, Khaalid ibn Waleed, and Sa'd ibn Abi Waqass.[39]  During the battle, Abu Sufyan, who had just become Muslim two weeks before, said about the Muslims:  "I wish their defeat would not stop, and they would keep running away and fleeing until they reach the sea [the Red Sea]."[40]  Only four stood with the Holy Prophet:  'Ali ibn Abi Taalib (as), the uncle of the Prophet (saawaws) al-'Abbas, Abu Sufyaan ibn al-Haarith (this Abu Sufyaan was from Bani Haashim), and 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud.[41]  The rest of the companions fled the scene.

 

 

The Conquests During the Time of the First Three Caliphs

 

Although the Messenger of Allah (saawaws) always fought at the forefront of his army, Abu Bakr, 'Umar, and 'Uthmaan never led their armies at all during their caliphates.  Instead, they sat in Madinah and dispatched their forces.  For example, as soon as Abu Bakr assumed the caliphate, he sent Usaamah ibn Zayd to fight the Romans rather than do it himself.  When Usaamah asked why 'Umar was remaining in Madinah, Abu Bakr said that he needed him there.  When Usaamah then asked why Abu Bakr himself was remaining in Madinah, Abu Bakr told him:  "Just lead the army and go."[42]

 

Despite the unwillingness of the first three caliphs to participate in military activity, the conquests during their caliphates were tremendous.  The Islamic influence spread far, and during the reign of 'Umar, the Persian and Roman Empires were both defeated.  However, the caliphs sent the Muslims in the battle less for military necessity and more to prevent political unrest.  This trend is most visible in the advice 'Abdullah ibn Aamir gave 'Uthmaan ibn 'Affan to command the Muslims to fight to busy themselves so that 'Uthmaan would have less difficulties with the masses. 

 

When Banu Umayyah came to power, they fabricated stories saying that Imam 'Ali (as) advised 'Umar and Abu Bakr not to lead their armies since they themselves were the leaders of the people.  Such stories are obviously false since, during his caliphate, Imam 'Ali (as) led his troops himself and so would not have advised another to do otherwise.

 

A Brief Introduction to Some of the Companions of the Prophet (s)

 

Abu Bakr ('Abdullah ibn 'Uthmaan).  Abu Bakr was named 'Abdullah by the Holy Prophet (s). [43]  Before that, he was known as 'Abd al-Ka'bah (the worshipper of the Ka'bah) and 'Ateeq.  Although A'ishah is said to have said that the Prophet (s) called Abu Bakr 'ateeq Allah min al-naar, or the person whom Allah has vindicated from the Fire,[44] sources indicate that Abu Bakr's father called him 'ateeq long before Islam because of the delicacy of his skin.[45]  His mother's name is recorded to have been Salma.

 

Abu Bakr was the fifteenth man to embrace Islam,[46] not the first as many erroneously believe.  He made a living selling clothing, as did 'Uthmaan ibn 'Affan, 'Abd al-Rahmaan ibn 'Auf, and Talha.

 

 

'Umar ibn al-Khattab ibn Nafeel ibn 'Uday ibn Ka'ab.[47]  'Umar ibn al-Khattab was born thirteen years after the Year of the Elephant and so was thirteen years younger than the Prophet (s), eleven years younger than Abu Bakr, and seven years younger than 'Uthmaan ibn 'Affaan.  While young, his mother was adopted by Hishaam ibn al-Mugheerah, so she was known as Hantamah bint Hishaam ibn al-Mugheerah.[48]  He made a living as a broker.

 

'Umar was the seventy-fifth man and sixty-sixth person to accept Islam.  He did so right before the migration from Makkah to Madinah; thus, he did not participate in the first hijrah to Ethiopia.[49]  Before joining the Muslims, 'Umar hated Islam and the Muslims so severely that he beat his brother-in-law and hit his sister when he discovered they had become Muslims.[50]  Perhaps for this reason, 'Umar was chosen by the rest of the Quraysh to kill the Prophet (s).[51]  So, one day, 'Umar took his sword and went to the house of Ibn Ab al-Arqam, where the Holy Prophet (s) was with his uncle Hamzah and some of the companions.  He knocked loudly and burst into the house angrily.  The Prophet (s) restrained him and shook him so hard that he was thrown to the ground.  Then he said:  "Isn't it time that you stop your persecution and terrorization of the Muslims?"  'Umar replied:  "I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, One with no partner, and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and messenger."[52]  These circumstances, which are well documented, suggest that 'Umar's conversion resulted from an admonishment and a veiled threat.

 

Throughout his life, 'Umar was known for his toughness and audacity.  He usually frowned, and he used his hand or -- during his caliphate -- his stick (durrah) to punish people.  He quickly angered and judged others with the same rapidity.  Even after accepting Islam, Umar described the Prophet (s) as a "tree grown in the trash."[53]  He was known to be particularly rough with women, whether they were his daughters, his wife, his sisters, strangers, or Fatimah al-Zahra (as), the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s), whom he beat.  He wrote:  "I buried my daughter alive, and while I was burying her, she was putting her hands on my beard to clean the dust from it."[54]  Al-Ash'ath ibn Qays recalls that when he was hosting 'Umar and one of his wives, in the middle of the night, 'Umar kept beating his wife until he stopped him.[55]  'Umar told another one of his wives:  "You are nothing but a toy that men play with, and then you are abandoned."[56]  Because he was so harsh, women usually declined his proposals; one of those who refused him was Um Kulthum, the daughter of Abu Bakr.[57] 

 

'Umar did not confine his abuse to the women of his household.  When A'ishah was mourning the death of her father Abu Bakr, he threatened to hit her if she did not stop, and, eventually, he began beating her sister, Um Farwah, with his stick.  So they stopped crying.[58]  Another time, when he heard the cry of another lady, he took it upon himself to enter her house and hit her with his stick until her head-covering fell off.[59]  When Zaynab died, 'Umar hit the women who were crying over her until the Messenger of Allah (saawaws) seized his hand and told him to stop.[60]  And needless to mention is the tragedy when 'Umar attacked the house of the daughter of the Prophet (saawaws) and forced her to miscarry the next grandson of the Holy Prophet (saawaws).

 

Because of his violent tendencies, 'Umar was greatly feared.  Bukhari relates an unusual story[61] where some women were sitting with the Prophet (saawaws) and asking him questions so enthusiastically that they raised their voices above the voice of the Prophet (saawaws).  'Umar sought permission to enter, and as soon as they heard him, they became afraid and put on their hijab.  After the Prophet (saawaws) gave him permission, he entered, and the Prophet (saawaws) laughed.  'Umar asked the Prophet (saawaws):  "Why do you laugh, O Messenger of Allah?"  The Prophet (saawaws) replied:  "I am surprised at these women who were sitting next to me not wearing the hijab, but the moment they heard your voice, they rushed to wear the hijab."  'Umar rebuked them:  "You are the enemies of Allah; why do you not fear the Prophet and you fear me?"  They told him:  "Because you are harsher and more violent than the Prophet."  Bukhari considers this narration to be an example of the virtues of 'Umar ibn al-Khattab.

 

In another incident, 'Umar summoned a lady whose chastity he doubted to inquire whether her pregnancy was legitimate.  Terrified, the woman miscarried, and her baby died.  When 'Umar asked his aides whether he had to pay the diyyah (blood money), they told him he did not because he was only instructing her.  However, Imam 'Ali (as) told him:  "They misled you, they ill-advised you, and you have to pay the diyyah of this baby to its mother."

 

Men too were on the receiving end of 'Umar's durrah.  People said:  "The stick of 'Umar is sharper than the sword of Al-Hajjah," Al-Hajjah being a well-known tyrant who had killed thousands of his opponents.[62]  Ibn Sa'dah al-Hadhalah narrates:  "I saw 'Umar ibn al-Khattab in the market beating the merchants with his stick.  When they gathered around the food in the market, he wanted to disturb them, so he used his stick."[63]  When he was not using his stick, he often used his hands, or his feet, or he bit people.  For example, he bit the hand of 'Ubaydallah ibn 'Umar, the son of a man who called himself Abu 'Isaa, and warned him:  "Do not call yourself Abu 'Isaa since 'Isaa did not have a father."[64]  Again, in the market, he beat people for purchasing red meat two days in a row.[65]  And he beat Timeem al-Daarimi for performing the sunnah prayers after the afternoon prayers.[66]  He even beat the man who would later become a well-known transmitter of hadith, Abu Huraira.  Many of the companions referred to 'Umar's brutality, such as Bilaal[67] and 'Abd al-Rahmaan ibn 'Auf.[68]  'Umar himself knew he was too tough, and so he prayed:  "O my Lord, I am tough, so make me soft."[69]

 

In addition to using violence, 'Umar ibn al-Khattab also imprisoned many people during his caliphate.  Al-Dhahabi relates that 'Umar detained three prominent companions:  'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Abu Dardah, and Abu Mas'ud al-Ansaari.[70]  According to Abu Bakr Ibn 'Arabi, they were only released after 'Umar died.[71] 'Umar imprisoned these three because he feared they would spread certain ahaadith from the Prophet (saawaws) that threatened his rule.

 

Because they could not retaliate against him openly, people would aim their stones at him during the stoning of the Shaytan at Hajj and cause him to bleed.[72]  As was said about him:

 

Umar's toughness caused many of the Companions in Madinah to react against him.  Unlike his predecessor Abu Bakr, he was known for his toughness, and he was sometimes merciless.[73]

 

Umar saw little value in the blood relationship between him and the Prophet (s).  When Safiyyah, the aunt of the Prophet (s) whom the Prophet (s) respected considerably, lost her son, the Prophet (s) consoled her by saying that Allah would build a house in Paradise for whoever lost a child and was patient through the ordeal.  Safiyyah was calmed, and the Prophet (s) left.  Then Umar came and told her:  "Safiyyah, I heard your cries, and your relationship to the Prophet will not help you on the Day of Judgment."  At that, she started crying again.  The Prophet (s) heard her and said:  "O my aunt, you are still crying, and you heard what I said to you?"  She replied:  "No, O Messenger of Allah, what made me cry again was when Umar said to me that my relationship to the Prophet would not help me on the Day of Judgment."  Angered, the Prophet (s) told Bilal to call the prayers, and, when the people assembled, he climbed the pulpit, praised Allah, and asked:   "What is wrong with the people that they claim that my relationship does not benefit them and is useless on the Day of Judgment?  My relationship is binding in this world and in the Hereafter."[74]

 

'Umar is also recorded to have had a proclivity towards music and wine. [75]  Sine wine was initially discouraged, rather than prohibited, some Muslims drank between the revelation of the ayaat regarding alcohol while others did not.  'Umar was one of those who did drink, and, once, when he was drunk, he broke the head of 'Abd al-Rahman ibn 'Auf and then sat and lamented in poetic verse the mushrikeen who had been killed in the Battle of Badr.  When the Prophet (s) heard him, he came to 'Umar angrily and struck him, and Allah revealed the third verse completely prohibiting wine (5:91).  At that, 'Umar said:  "We stopped (intahayna), we stopped." [76]  However, during his caliphate, 'Umar is recorded to have continued asking for wine -- once when he was traveling to Shaam (Syria),[77] and once when he was traveling to Makkah, when he met a man named 'Abdullah ibn Ayaash al-Maszumi and sipped his wine before passing it on to the man on his right. [78]  Other stories also have been recorded, with the last instance of 'Umar drinking wine being when he did his prayers during which he was killed.[79]  Some explain these stories by saying that the wine that 'Umar drank after the time of jahilliyah was non-alcoholic.

 

As well as wine, 'Umar is recorded to have had a fondness for singing and music.  He habitually listened to and requested music.  He is said to have stayed awake until dawn to listen to singing (ghinaa').[80]

 

By the time 'Umar became caliph, the Muslims already had the Qur'an in its complete, present-day form, since the Prophet (s), had hand-picked scribes -- such as 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (as), 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Abu Dardah, Zayd ibn Thaabit, Ma'aadh ibn Jabal, and Saalim Mawlaa Abi Hudayfah -- who copied it under his direct supervision.  During the lifetime of the Prophet (s), many of the companions -- forty-one of whom are recorded by Ibn Nadeem[81] -- had written the entire revelation by their own hands, and so each copy was known as "the copy of 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud", "the copy of Ibn 'Abbas", and so on.

Many verses of the Holy Qur'an, such as 80:13-15, 76:77-79, 25:5, and 98:2, refer to its preserved status during the lifetime of the Holy Prophet (s). 

 

In later times, some attempted to credit Abu Bakr and 'Umar for first compiling the Qur'an, but those who did so neglected the earlier historical references.  In reality, 'Umar not only lacked interest in the Qur'an, but he also cast serious doubt on its completeness and authenticity.  Oftentimes, he would inform the people from the minbar that verses of

the Qur'an had disappeared.  Some, he said, were lost with the death of the Prophet (s),[82] and, according to Bukhari, as for others, he said:  "Allah sent Muhammad with the truth, and He sent a book on him, and we used to read verses in that book, and we don't find them anymore."  In this case, 'Umar was referring to a verse which he thought he recalled about stoning adulteresses.[83]  During the dawn prayers, 'Umar would recite verses which no one else had ever heard; he called them "al-hafd (?) wal-khul'".[84]  As for the entirety of the Qur'an, 'Umar mentioned that it was composed of 1,027,000 letters, while the extant Qur'an consists of just over 300,000 letters. [85]  And he would argue these points.  Once, he asked Hudayfah, one of the original transcribers of the Qur'an, how many verses were in Surah al-Ahzaab, and Hudayfah answered that there were 72 or 73.  'Umar countered that the number of verses in that surah was similar to the number of verses in Surah al-Baqarah -- that is, 286 verses -- implying that over 200 verses of the original surah had been lost. [86]  He also said flat out that Surah al-Tawbah was only one-fourth of the original, and that it was first called Surat al-Adhaab (Punishment) before the people changed its name to Surah al-Tawbah (Repentance).[87]

 

Tafsir, or the interpretation of the verses of the Holy Qur'an, was also not one of 'Umar's strong points.  When people asked him questions about the meaning of the Qur'an that he could not answer, he would discourage them from asking and sometimes react violently.[88]  When a man came to 'Umar and inquired what verse 4:128 meant, Umar hit him rather than admit that he did not know the answer.  Similarly, when someone asked 'Umar what "fodder" meant in "We split the earth in fragments and produce therein grain... and fruits and fodder,"[89] 'Umar reproached him, saying:  "You have the book of your Lord with you.  Practice what you know from it, and leave what you do not know." [90]  According to Ibn Ab al-Hadid, 'Umar was not overly concerned with the interpretation (tafsir) of the Qur'an and used to say:  "Just recite the Qur'an, and do not interpret it (tufassiruhu)"[91] since he himself did not know much about it. 

 

Occasionally, 'Umar would hear verses of the Qur'an but not recognize them as such.[92]  One day, 'Umar angrily interrupted a man who was reading verse 11 from Surah al-Tawbah because he did not recognize the verse and assumed the man was inventing it. 

Defending himself, the man asserted:  "Yes, I heard it from 'Ubay ibn Ka'ab," one of the transcribers of the Qur'an.  So 'Umar went to 'Ubay ibn Ka'ab and asked him three times about the verse.  Each time, he said:  "Yes, I received it from Prophet Muhammad."  At that, Umar left raising his hands and shouting "Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar," confessing that the verse was authentic but that he had never heard it before.[93]  Elsewhere, when 'Umar saw verse 9 of Surat al-Jum'ah written on a table, he questioned:  "Who dictated this verse to you?"  Someone replied that 'Ubay ibn Ka'ab had narrated the verse.  'Umar said:  "The Prophet died, and we did not read this verse the way it is written here."  He then continued that the verse should have read "fa'undhu ilaa dhikr Allah" instead of "fa'saw ilaa dhikr Allah" (with both versions having the same meaning of "march" or "go").[94] 

 

'Umar himself knew that his knowledge of the Qur'an was lacking.  Once, when he heard a man read verse 107 of Surah al-Maa'idah, he told him:  "You are a liar."  The man replied:  "You are a liar."  Another man interjected:  "Are you denying that the Commander of the Faithful is saying the truth?"  The man replied:  "No, I respect the Commander of the Faithful, but he is unaware of the Qur'an."  Umar admitted:  "He is telling the truth (sadaq)."[95]  As 'Ubay ibn Ka'ab, one of the scribers of the Qur'an, commented:  "I was busy with the Qur'an during the time of the Prophet, but you were busy walking in the markets and in the streets."[96]

 

An assailant stabbed 'Umar ibn al-Khattab on Wednesday, four days before the end of Dhul Hijjah in 23 AH.[97] He was buried the following Sunday, the first day of Muharram, in 24 AH.  His khilaafah lasted ten years, five months, and 21 days.  When he died, some say he was 66 years old.  As his condition worsened, he realized that his life was about to end, and he began addressing the subject of his impending death with apprehension and anxiety.  'Abdullah ibn 'Ammar ibn Rabi'ah relates:[98]

 

I saw 'Umar when he was on his deathbed, holding in his hand a piece of straw.  He raised it and said:  "I wish I were this straw.  I wish I was nothing.  I wish my mother had not delivered me."

 

Soon after, he said:[99]

 

I wish I were a male sheep in my family.  They would feed me and fatten me and, once I became fat, someone who likes my family would visit, so they would slaughter me.  They would grill part of me and dry the second half.  After that, they would eat me and turn me into adharah.  And I wish I were not a human being.

 

He expressed a similar sentiment again:[100]

 

I wish I were a tree on the side of the road, and a camel would pass by and eat me, and start to chew me, and swallow me, and then get rid of me as its droppings.  I wish I were not a human being.

 

These statements raise many questions.  Perhaps 'Umar was regretting how he had treated the Prophet (saawaws), how he had accused the Prophet (saawaws) of hallucinating[101] or how he had delayed the burial of the Prophet (saawaws) until Abu Bakr had returned to participate in the power-sharing.[102]  Perhaps he was regretting tugging on the clothes of the Prophet (saawaws) while he was reading Salaat al-Janaazah[103] or raising his voice above the voice of the Prophet (saawaws) despite the command of the Qur'an to the contrary (49:2).  Or perhaps, at the time of his death, the incident at the house of Fatimah came to mind.

 

Just before he perished, 'Umar was resting his head in the lap of his son 'Abdullah.  He asked his son to put his cheek on the ground.  His son did not listen, so 'Umar repeated his words harshly.  As soon as his cheek touched the earth, 'Umar said:  "Woe to 'Umar and to the mother of 'Umar if Allah does not forgive 'Umar."

 

 

Uthmaan ibn 'Affaan

 

Before assuming the caliphate, 'Uthmaan had agreed to follow the policies of his predecessors.  However, after becoming caliph, he reverted to the jahiliyyah practice of privileging his own relatives.  Aware of 'Uthmaan's tendencies in that direction, 'Umar had warned him to refrain from nepotism on the grounds that the people would reject it and the Quraysh would loose power, [104] but 'Uthmaan could not or would not heed this advice.  Unlike Abu Bakr and 'Umar, 'Uthmaan filled the official positions with his own tribesmen such as Abu Sufyan, Marwaan ibn al-Hakam, Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan, Al-Waleed ibn 'Uqbah, 'Abdullah ibn Abi Sarh, and Sa'eed ibn al-'Aas.  In doing so, he angered many, even those on the side of Quraysh such as A'ishah, the wife of the Prophet (saawaws).  Particularly upset were those who lost power due to 'Uthmaan's nepotism such as Amr ibn al-'Aas, who lost Egypt; Al-Mugheerah ibn Shu'bah, who lost Kufa; and Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, who lost Basra.  Adding insult to injury, 'Uthmaan then appointed incompetent and corrupt individuals from Bani Umayyah to fill those positions.  As a result, some of those townships revolted, and in Kufa, for example, the people ousted 'Uthmaan's choice and reinstated Abu Musa al-Ash'ari.[105]

 

'Uthmaan's nepotism led to his assassination and the awaited succession of Imam 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (as) to the caliphate.  After Imam 'Ali (as) was murdered, power shifted again to the Quraysh alliance under the rule of Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan.  Learning from 'Uthmaan's errors, Mu'awiyah balanced political with tribal alliances and followed 'Umar's practice of appointing allies from outside his own tribe to official positions.  Hence, Amr ibn al-'Aas, Al-Mugheerah ibn al-Shu'bah, Abu Hurayrah (may God have mercy upon him), Al-Nu'maan ibn Basheer, and 'Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Khaalid all found places in the new caliphate, and even A'ishah was pacified.

 

The main reason 'Uthmaan was killed was for financial mismanagement.  A'ishah was the first to censure him regarding that.  While both the Prophet (saawaws) and Abu Bakr had distributed the revenue from the treasury equally, 'Umar had begun to shift the distribution in favor of his allies.  Thus, 'Umar had assigned A'ishah, the daughter of Abu Bakr; Hafsa, his own daughter; and Um Habiba, the daughter of Abu Sufyan 12,000 dinars a month while providing the rest of the wives of the Prophet (s) with only 5,000 dinars per month.  When 'Uthmaan came to power, he wanted to lower A'ishah's stipend to match that of the others, and she became angry at him.[106]  According to Tabari, she was the first person to turn away from 'Uthmaan,[107] and she is recorded to have said:  "Kill Na'thal [the nickname she gave to 'Uthmaan], for he disbelieved."[108]

 

Further information about these individuals can be found in the history of Tabari.[109]

 

A Dialogue between 'Abdullah ibn al-'Abbas and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab

 

'Abdullah ibn al-'Abbas and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab spoke many times.  On one occasion, they debated whether Bani Haashim should hold the caliphate:[110]

 

'Umar:  Do you know why the people did not elect you [the family of the Prophet] to the caliphate?

Ibn 'Abbas:  No, I do not know.

'Umar:  I know what the reason was.

Ibn 'Abbas:  What was it?

'Umar:  The Quraysh hated to see Prophethood and the Caliphate vested in one house.  If that had happened, you would have wronged the people.

Ibn 'Abbas:  Can Amir al-Mu'mineen control his anger if I want to say something?
'Umar:  Say whatever you want to say.

Ibn 'Abbas:  If you say the Quraysh hated to see this, Allah in the Qur'an has said about some of the companions:  "That is because they hate the revelation of Allah, so He has made their deeds fruitless."[111]  And if you say that we will do injustice if both Prophethood and the Caliphate are vested in our family, then if we are supposed to do mischief, we will do mischief even without being caliphs or successors simply because we are the family of the Prophet (saawaws) and the closest people to him.  But we will not do that because our stance, morality, and attitude mirrors the attitude of the Prophet (saawaws), about whom Allah (swt) says:  "Verily, you stand on an exalted standard of character."[112]  And Allah said again:  "Lower your wing to the believers who follow you."[113]  We will not depart from him, so why are you worried that if we become caliph we will do mischief?  If you say:  "The Quraysh chose Abu Bakr and 'Umar", Allah answers:  "Your Lord creates and chooses as He pleases.  No choice have they in the matter."[114]  And you know, 'Umar, that Allah has chosen certain people from among His creatures to lead humanity.  If the Quraysh had joined their vision with the plan of Allah, then the community would have been prosperous and successful.

'Umar:  Calm down, Ibn 'Abbas.  You members of Bani Haashim, your heart only wanted to deceive the Quraysh permanently, and you hold perpetual hatred and animosity towards the Quraysh.

Ibn 'Abbas:  Calm down yourself, 'Umar, do not say that the hearts of Bani Haashim are deceitful.  Their hearts are part of the heart of the Messenger of Allah.  It is the same heart of the Messenger of Allah (saawaws) that Allah has cleansed and purified, and they are the family of the Prophet (saawaws) whom Allah describes as:  "Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, O Members of the Family of the Prophet, and to make you pure and spotless."[115]  If you speak of animosity and grudges in our heart, this would be natural given that our right has been usurped from us and is in the hand of a transgressor.

'Umar:  What are you saying, Ibn 'Abbas?  I have heard some bad things about you, and if I mention them to you, you would lose your respect in my eyes.

Ibn 'Abbas:  What have you heard about me?  Tell me.  If it is false, I will defend myself.  If it is true, I would never lose my respect in your eyes.

'Umar:  I have heard you telling people that this issue [the khilaafah] was taken from the Family of the Prophet out of jealousy and injustice.

Ibn 'Abbas:  Regarding jealousy, yes, that is true, because Iblis was jealous of Adam and forced him from Paradise.  We are the children of Adam, and there is always jealousy among us.  If you say "transgression", you know better who has the right in this matter [the khilaafah], and you, 'Umar, are the best person to answer this question.  Did you not say, 'Umar, that the Arabs are closer to the non-Arabs to the Prophet (saawaws), and did you not say that the Quraysh are closer than the other tribes to the Prophet (saawaws)?  If you have said that, then when you come to the Quraysh, who among them is closest to the Prophet (saawaws)?  Of course they are Bani Haashim.  I am using the same analogy that you did.  We have more right to the khilaafah than the other people of Quraysh.

'Umar:  Stand up and go home.

 

Ibn 'Abbas stood.  While he was leaving, 'Umar said:  "You who are leaving, come back.  Despite what has happened between us, you are still respected in my eyes."

 

Ibn 'Abbas answered:  "You who are khalifah now, we also have to preserve your right."

 

After Ibn 'Abbas left, 'Umar turned to the people around him and said:  "I never saw Ibn 'Abbas discuss something with anyone and not defeat him."

 

 

The Innovations of 'Umar ibn al-Khattab

 

According to historical records, 'Umar ibn al-Khattab prided himself on his improvements to the teachings of the Qur'an and the Prophet (saawaws).  Although Abu Bakr and 'Uthmaan both adjusted religious law for special cases,[116] 'Umar relied almost entirely on his own opinion and encouraged others to do the same.  When he appointed Shurayh al-Qaadi as the religious judge, he instructed him: [117]

 

If you are searching for a verdict, then look in the Book of God. If you do not find one, look in the Tradition of the Prophet.  And if you do not find it in the Tradition of the Prophet, then make a verdict yourself

 

Similarly, he wrote to Abu Musa al-Ash'ari:  "If you do not find an answer in the Book or the Tradition, then make an analogy and develop an answer yourself." [118]  For these reasons, Tabari says that people preferred not to take their disputes to 'Umar, for he was known for judging by his personal beliefs rather than Islamic criteria.[119]

 

Some of the practices that 'Umar is best known for changing are the adhaan, prayer without tahaarah, tarawih prayers, prayers for the deceased, and the laws of divorce.

 

The Adhaan.  Initially, "Al-salaat khayrun min al-nawm" ("prayer is better than sleep") was not part of the adhaan.  But, one morning, 'Umar's servant came to wake 'Umar for prayer by calling to him:  "Al-salaat khayrun min al-nawm".  Approving of that phrase, 'Umar instructed the mu'adhdhin to include it in the adhaan from then on.[120]

 

 

Prayer without Tahaarah.  Bukhari narrates that, one day, a man came to 'Umar and said:  "I am in a state of janaabah and cannot find water."  'Umar told him:  "Do not pray."  'Ammar ibn Yassir, who was sitting there, said:[121]

 

Do you not remember that you and I were in a battalion going to the battles, and both of us woke up and found ourselves in a state of ritual impurity, and we did not find water.  So you did not pray, but I did tayammum in the dust.  We mentioned this to the Prophet, and the Prophet said that you could have put your hands in the dust and did tayammum.

 

The Qur'an too prescribes tayammum for situations when water cannot be found (4:43).  Most of the Sunni schools of thought follow the Qur'an in this regard.  Only the Hanafi school follows 'Umar's opinion and indicates that tayammum is permissible only while traveling or ill and that, in other cases, a person who cannot find water for tahaarah should not pray.

 

 

Taraawih Prayers.  Bukhari narrates from 'Abdullah ibn 'Abd al-Qaari:

 

I went with 'Umar ibn al-Khattab during his rule as khalifah one night of Ramadhaan to the mosque.  We saw the people praying scattered, not together.  'Umar said:  "It is best if those people can pray together, and there is only one who leads the prayers."  So he gathered them and appointed 'Ubay ibn Ka'b to lead the prayers.

 

Another night, I went with 'Umar to the mosque and saw that the people were praying together, organized, and 'Umar said:  "What an excellent innovation (ni'm al-bid'ah haadhihi). [122]

 

 

Prayers for the Deceased.  Although Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Muslim, and Nisaa'i all relate that the Prophet (saawaws) read prayers over the deceased with five takbiraat, [123] 'Umar reduced the number of takbiraat in prayers over the deceased from five to four.[124]

 

Three Divorces in One Session.  According to the Holy Qur'an (2:229), a couple may divorce three times before they are no longer allowed to remarry.[125]  Divorce must be pronounced in three separate sessions, as the Holy Prophet (saawaws) explained: [126]

 

A man came to the Prophet and told him:  "I divorced my wife."  The Prophet asked:  "How did you divorce her?"  He said:  "Three times in one session."  The Prophet said:  "That divorce is considered only one divorce.  It cannot be considered three divorces, so you may bring your wife back to yourself."

 

However, historians say that when divorce became more prevalent during the second caliphate, 'Umar allowed men to read all three pronouncements of divorce at on time.[127]

 

Other Innovations.  'Umar also:

 

 

 

The History of the Adhaan

 

The majority of the Sunni commentators maintain that the Prophet (saawaws) learned the adhaan from a companion named 'Abdullah ibn Zayd.  Tirmidhi, Abu Dawud, and Ibn Maajah say the Prophet (saawaws) asked his companions how he should inform people about the time for prayer.  Some said he should use a banner, others said a horn, and others said a bell, like the Christians.  Those narrators say that night 'Abdullah ibn Zayd had a strange dream:

 

'Abdullah ibn Zayd saw a man carrying a bell in his hand.  He asked if he could buy the bell, and the man asked him what he wanted it for.  'Abdullah ibn Zayd said:  "I want to use it to call the people to prayer."  The man replied:  "I can teach you something better than ringing the bell" and then taught 'Abdullah ibn Zayd the adhaan.

 

In the morning, according to these commentators, 'Abdullah ibn Zayd told the Prophet (saawaws) his dream.  The Prophet (saawaws) replied:  "This is a true dream that you have seen.  Come with me to Bilaal.  Teach him what you have seen in the dream, and let Bilaal learn the adhaan."  The story concludes that when 'Umar heard the adhaan, he told the Prophet (saawaws):  "I swear I saw the same dream," and the Prophet (saawaws) said:  "Praise be to Allah."

 

Clearly, this story cannot be true, for surely Allah (swt), the Merciful, the Compassionate to humankind, would not provide detailed revelation and then omit an important practice such as the adhaan.  Another explanation -- which is the one accepted by Shi'a scholars -- is:[130]

 

Jibra'il came to the Prophet (saawaws) while the Prophet (saawaws) was resting on Imam 'Ali (as).  Jibra'il read the adhaan to them.  The Prophet (saawaws) turned to Imam 'Ali (as) and said:  "Did you hear the adhaan?"  Imam 'Ali (as) said:  "Yes."  The Prophet (saawaws) said:  "Did you memorize it?"  Imam 'Ali (as) said:  "Yes."  The Prophet (saawaws) said:  "Then call Bilaal; let us teach him the adhaan."  So they called Bilaal and taught him the adhaan.

 

Because it came from Jibra'il, the adhaan is considered to be part of the revelation and not a dream seen by one of the companions.



[1] Al-Mufradaat fi Ghareeb al-Qur'aan, the section on sahab

[2] Miqbaas al-Hidayah, al-Darajaat al-Rafi'a 10

[3] Mukhtasar 2:67

[4] Miqbaas al-Hidayah

[5] Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani 1:10

[6] The Kamilites

[7] Those who attributed divinity to certain indivudals

[8] ibn Hajar, al-Isaabah 1:17

[9] ibn Hajar, al-Isaabah 1:19; ibn 'Abd al-Birr, al-Isti'aab 1:8; ibn al-Atheer, Usd al-Ghaabah 1:3, et al.

[10] al-Sa'd al-Tafatahzaani, Sharh al-Maqaasir 5:310; al-Maarizi, al-Isaabah 1:19; al-Shawqaani, Irshaad al-Fuhul

[11] Shaikh Muhammad Abduh, Adwaa 'alaa al-Sunnah Muhammadi; Shaikh Mahmud Abu Riyah, Abu Hurairah 1:01

[12] Surah 9 and surah  63, respectively

[13] ibn Abul Hadid, Sharh Nahl al-Balaagah

[14] ibn 'Abd al-Birr, Jaami' Bayaan al-'Ilm

[15] Abul Fidaa, Al-Mukhtasar fi Akhbaar al-Bashar

[16] "Ashaabi kal-nujum..."

[17] Al-Taysir fi Sharh al-Tahreer 3:243, al-Muntakhab, ibn Qudaamah, et al.

[18] Ibn 'Abd al-Birr, Jaami' Bayaan al-'Ilm 2:89

[19] Ibn 'Abd al-Birr, Jaami' Bayaan al-'Ilm, 2:90; I'laam al-Muwaqqa'in 2:223; al-Bahr al-Muhit5:528

[20] I'laam al-Muwaqqa'in 2:223

[21] Sahih al-Bukhari, include reference; Sahih Muslim, Baab al-Hawdh, 7:65; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 5:333

[22] Ahmad Amin, Fajr al-Islaam, p. 213

[23] Al-Bayhaqi, Dalaa'il al-Nubuwwah, 3:218; Ibn Qutaybah, Al-Ma'arif, p. 159

[24] Tabari 2:197; Ibn Athir, Al-Kaamil fil-Tarikh, 2:154

[25] Sahih Muslim 5:78; Dalaa'il al-Nubuwwah; al-Bayhaqi, 3:234; al-Dhahabi, Tarikh al-Islam, p. 191

[26] Hayqil, Hayatu Muhammad, p. 244

[27] Ibn Abel Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaaghah 15:22

[28] Muhammad Hasanain Hayqil, Hayat Muhammad, p. 245

[29] Mafaatih al-Ghayb, 9:53; Tafsir al-Fakhr al-Raazi, 3:198; Al-Seerah al-Halabiyyah, 2:227

[30] Ibn al-Athir, Al-Kaamil fil-Tarikh, 2:158; Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah 4:32; Tarikh al-Tabari, 2:203

[31] Ibn Kathir, Al-Seerah al-Nabawiyyah, 2:391-395; Dalaa'il al-Nubuwwah 3:106; Al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah, 3:321

[32] Maghaazi al-Waaqidi 1:152; Dalaa'il al-Nubuwwah 3:124

[33] Ibn Shabbah, Tarikh al-Madinah al-Munawwarah, 3:1033

[34] Al-Haythami, Majma' al-Zawaaid, 9:124; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:465, hadith #1155; Muhammad Hasanain Hayqil, Hayat Muhammad, p. 312

[35] Al-Dhahabi, Tarikh al-Islam, 2:412

[36] Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah 3:39; Maghaazi al-Waaqidi, 2:654; Sirat ibn Hisham, 3:349; Tarikh al-Tabari, 2:200, et. al.

[37] Al-Zamakhshari, Tafsir al-Kashshaaf, 2:259; Tarikh Abul Fida, 1:208; Al-Seerah al-Halabiyyah, 3:110

[38] Sunan al-Nisaa'i, 3:871 hadith #3877

[39] Maghaazi al-Waaqidi, 2:904

[40] Maghaazi al-Waaqidi, 2:904

[41] Tarikh al-Khamis p. 102; Al-Seerah al-Halabiyyah 3:109

[42] Tarikh al-Tabari, 2:462

[43] Ibn Qutaybah;, Al-Ma'aarif 167

[44] Tarikh al-Tabari 2:615

[45] Tabaqaat ibn Sa'ad 3:187

[46] Tarikh al-Tabari 2:316

[47] Tarikh al-Madinah al-Munawwarah 2:654

[48] Ibn al-Atheer, Usud al-Ghaabah 4:145

[49] Tarikh al-Tabari 5:17

[50] Al-'Aqqad, 'Abqariyat 'Umar, p. 33

[51] Ibn Ishaaq, A-Seerah al-Nabawiyyah 160; Ibn Asaakir, Mukhtasar Tarikh Dimishq 18:271

[52] Ibn Asaakir; Mukhtasar Tarikh Damashq 18:269

[53] Tadhkiraat al-Fuqahaa 2:470; Sahih al-Bukhari 8:94-95; Sahih Muslim 7:92-93; and others

[54] Al-'Aqqad, Abqariyat 'Umar, 33

[55] Sunan Ibn Maajah, 1:693, Musnad Ahmad, 1:20

[56] Ibn al-Jawzi, Tarikh 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, p. 114; (author?), Al-Shaykhaan, p. 189

[57] Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Umam wal-Muluk, 5:17; Ibn Athir, Al-Kaamil fil-Tarikh, 3:54

[58] Ibn Haajir, Al-Isaabah, 3:606; Ibn Sa'd, Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd, 3:208

[59] Ibn Abel Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaaghah, 3:111

[60] Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 1:237; Mustadrak al-Haakim, 3:191

[61] Baab al-Tabassum, 4:63

[62] Tarikh al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, 2:686

[63] Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd, 5:60

[64] Umdat al-Qaari', 7:143

[65] Al-Haythami, Majma' al-Zawaa'id, 5:35

[66] Al-Haythami, Majma' al-Zawaa'id; Sahih Muslim, 1:310; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 4:102

[67] Al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-Khulafaa', p.130

[68] Ibn Abel Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaaghah, 1:55

[69] Tarikh al-Khamis, 2:241

[70] Al-Dhahabi, Tadhkirat al-Huffaz, 1:2; Adwaa' 'alaa Sunan Muhammadiyyah, p. 45

[71] Abu Bakr ibn al-'Arabi, Al-Awaasim min al-Qawaasim, p. 75-76

[72] Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd, 5:64

[73] Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd, 5:60; Umdat al-Qaari', 7:143; Sahih Muslim, 1:310; Musnad Ahmad, 4:102; Ibn al-Jawzi, Sirat 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, p. 174; Kanz al-'Umaal, 4:334; et al.

[74] Al-Haythami, Majma' al-Zawaa'id 8:216

[75] Al-'Aqqad,  Abqariyat 'Umar  61:265

[76] "Intahayna, intahayna"; Al-Mustadraf 2:499-500; Jaami' al-Bayaan 2:211

[77] Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd 3:230

[78] Muwatta' Maalik 2:894

[79] Sahih al-Bukhari (what reference?); Tabaqaat Ibn Sa'd 3:257; Isti'aab Ibn 'Abd al-Birr 3:1154

[80] Sunan al-Kubra al-Bayhaqi 5:69; Al-Muhalla 9:62; Ibn Sa'd ,Al Tabaqaat al-Kubraa 4:163

[81] Ibn Nadeem, his fihrist, p. 41

[82] Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur, 5:179

[83] Bukhari, 10:43; Abu Ubaydah, Al-Itqaan 2:42; Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur, 1:106

[84] Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur 3:296; Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Kanz al-'Ummal, 8:74-75,78

[85] Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur, 6:222; Al-Haythami, Majma' al-Zawaa'id, 7:163; Kanz al-'Ummal, 1:517

[86] Musnah Ahmad 5:132; Mustadrak al-Haakim 2:415; Sunan al-Bayhaqi, 8:211

[87] Mustadrak al-Haakim 2:330; Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur, 1:105; et al.

[88] Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Kanz al-'Ummal1:229; Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur, 6:321

[89] 80:31

[90] Al-Suyuti, Al-Durr al-Manthur 6:317; Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Kanz al-Ummal 2:328

[91] Ibn Ab al-Hadid, 3:120

[92] Kanz al-Ummal, 2:568 hadith #4744

[93] Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Kanz al-'Ummal, 2:605

[94] Sahih al-Bukhari 3:201

[95] Ibn Shabbah, Tarikh al-Madinah al-Munawwarah, 2:709

[96] Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Kanz al-'Ummal-- where?

[97] Ibn Atheer, Usd al-Ghaabah

[98] Al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-Khulafaa, p. 129

[99] Al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-Khulafaa, p. 142; Muntakhab Kanz al-'Ummaal, 4:361; 6:365

[100] Muntakhab Kanz al-'Ummal, 4:361

[101] Sahih Bukhari, 1:120, Kitaab al-'Ilm; Sahih Muslim, 11:89

[102] Tarikh al-Tabari, 2:442; Sirat ibn Hishaam 4:305

[103] Sahih al-Bukhaari, Kitaab al-Libaas; Kanz al-'Umaal, hadith #4403

[104] Ibn al-Athir, Al-Kaamil fil-Tarikh, 3:67

[105] Ibn Sa'd, Al-Tabaqaat, 5:33

[106] Tarikh al-Ya'qubi, 2:132

[107] Tabari, 5:72

[108] Tarikh al-Tabari, 3:477

[109] Tarikh al-Tabari, 2:452

[110] Tarikh al-Tabari 5:30; Qasas al-'Arab, 2:363; Ibn al-Atheer, Al-Kaamil fil-Tarikh, 3:63; Ibn Abel Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaaghah, 3:107

[111] 47:9

[112] 68:4

[113] 26:215

[114] 28:68

[115] 33:33

[116] For example, Abu Bakr was unwilling to prosecute Khaalid ibn al-Waleed, who killed Maalik ibn Nuwayrah and, on the same night, committed adultery with this victim's wife.  Abu Bakr said:  "He made ijtihaad, but of course he made an error," and left the matter at that. 

[117] Muhammad al-Khudari, Tarikh al-Tashri' al-Islaami, p. 83

[118] Muhammad al-Khudari, Tarikh al-Tashri' al-Islaami,p. 83

[119] Al-Tabari, 2:617

[120] Jalaal al-Deen al-Suyuti, footnoted in Tanweer al-Hawaalik referencing Muwatta' Maalik; Sunan al-Tirmidhi 1:64

[121] Sunan al-Nisaa'i, 1:169; Sunan ibn Maajah, 1:188; Al-Bayhaqi, Al-Sunan al-Kubraa, 1:209; Tafsir ibn Katheer, 4:505; Ibn Qudaamah, Al-Mughni, 1:234; Ibn Rushd, Al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah, 1:63

[122] Sahih al-Bukhaari, 3:58; Tarikh al-Madinah (al-Munawwarah?), 2:713; Al-Riyaadh al-Naadhirah, 1:309; Tarikh al-Ya'qubi, 2:114

[123] Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 4:370; Sahih Muslim, Baab al-Salaat 'alaa al-Qabr, Kitaab al-Janaazah

[124] Al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-Khulafaa, p. 137

[125] Al-Jassas, Ahkaam al-Qur'aan, 1:378

[126] Sirat ibn Ishaaq, 2:191

[127] Sunan Muslim, Chapter of Talaaq al-Thalaat, 1:575; Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 1:314; Al-Bayhaqi, 7:336

[128] Umdat al-Qaari', 4:87; Sahih al-Bukhaari, 2:102; Sahih Muslim, 2:238

[129] Tabaqaat ibn Sa'd, 5:51; Umdat al-Qaari', 7:143

[130] Wasaa'il al-Shi'ah, 4:612